Category: Whore Feminism

Feminist manifestos from the whore’s point of view. Essays on sex work, sovereignty, and the politics of desire: unapologetic, radical, and sacred.

  • 116. What “Whore of New York: A Confession” by Liara Roux Reveals About Becoming an Escort

    116. What “Whore of New York: A Confession” by Liara Roux Reveals About Becoming an Escort

    Identity, sexuality, and the conditions under which the work takes shape

    A reading of the memoir Whore of New York: A Confession by Laura Roux

    Most writing about sex work falls into two categories: defence or titillation. Both are incomplete.  What interests me is something else entirely: the choices we make, a kind of professional coming-of-age, the circumstances that led up to that, and insight into the decision-making process.  Even if whoring may not be the world’s oldest profession, it is certainly the most fascinating and controversial.

    Whore of New York: A Confessionby Liara Roux sits in that space. The memoir is not about Sex Work as performance, but one that shows the best and worst of the profession, how the author’s own journey led her to making this choice, and also the flowering of her sexuality alongside her work in the sexual domain.

    Sometimes you read a book that just grabs you.  The people in it, the narrative, becomes something you can crawl inside of, that you can feel.  Mostly, that is a kind of happy-only narrative.  This book has much more nuance and complexity, which is what I liked most.

    Whore of New York by Liara Roux resonated.  An autobiography, the book is a rare glimpse into the genesis of an escort.  What her life was like growing up.  How she came to The Work.  Glimpses of her experiences.

    Reviews are so often promotional in nature, breathless in their descriptions, tantalising and titillating. Especially when they have a whiff of scandal or sex about them. I found this book to be one of the best renditions of this Demi-monde. It is raw, confessional, at times sexy, but also brutal and harsh.

    What I loved most about the book was that it didn’t fetishize or glamourise Sex Work.  In fact, it is hardly about Sex Work at all.  It is a book about life, relationships, growing up, mental health.  It is a very human narrative.

    The deepest thread in the book is about the gradual recognition and evolution of her own sexuality. The movement towards understanding herself as either gay or bisexual emerges through lived experience, relationships, and contrast. The awkward fumbling, the confusing feelings, shame.  It felt true and real and something I could also relate to. This was the part of the book that spoke to me most directly, not as a moment of clarity, but as a process of noticing, testing, and, at times, resisting what is already there.

    Central to the book is an exploration of feeling and motivation, none of which is presented as “because of this, I did this”…but rather simply showing her life as it unfolded.  Yes, an author can always be selective about the information they convey, but there was nothing here that felt out of place, artificial, forced.

    We never really perceive our own lives as structural narrative.  Reality is far too messy for that. There is no neat sequencing of cause and effect. We all make a series of decisions with partial information, and they are shaped by context, pressure, and need. For those of who us who are in the work, we can see it clearly. We never become Sex Workers through a singular logic, but through an accumulation of factors, whether economic, sexual or otherwise, real desires, or even constraints that only make sense when looking back.

    Reading of her marriage to an abusive partner, it was impossible not to be in her pain with her.  The feeling of loyalty to a partner, the internalisation that ‘I am the one at fault’, not the abuser.  How common that is for those of us who have experienced this.  How we seek to please those around us, especially women.  The exploitation described here is not a function of the profession, even if our work increases our precarity because of the legal and social context in which it sits but is more reflective of an abusive dynamic that could exist in any context.

    There is very little in the book about Sex Work itself.  There is some discussion of the relentless pace and travel schedule she maintained, but it is more about how her wife exploited her, abused her, used her, took her money and made her work despite its horrible effects on the author’s health. 

    The snippets of her work life are sympathetically portrayed as she focusses on a small number of clients that she enjoyed spending time with.  What I took from these gentle narrations was not the act or content of their interactions, but her descriptions of how she nurtured her clients, and how they also took care of her.

    What is implicit here is that these dynamics do not happen by accident. They are built, maintained, and selected for, and not every client is capable of participating in them at this level.  I like this, because the external perception of our collective work, or even the idea that anyone could possibly know what a session is really like, even begin to understand the deep dynamic which plays out between two people, is so very rarely seen.  This is one of the book’s greatest strengths.

    We, society at large, often concentrate on the exploitative elements that we might imagine comes with this work.  There was none of that.  If anything, one takes away how for Liara, Sex Work gave independence, purpose.  It is also painfully clear that she is a bright, well-educated human, one with options, choices.  That she chose the profession she did becomes very understandable as we see her through her childhood and young adulthood.

    A part of what resonated for me in her story is how parallel the “finding herself” aspects of beginning in the Profession related to what I am going through now.  Figuring out what I want to do and why, what my boundaries are, who I am willing to see, how much I am willing to work, why I would even do it in the first place.  All great questions.

    This book was hard for me to put down.  It is engaging and well-written, with an enticing prose style.  I hope that she takes this opener and continues to write, whether about her own life or through fiction.

    What the book leaves the reader with is a set of questions rather than conclusions. What does it mean to choose this work, and under what conditions does that choice hold?  What distinguishes endurance from agency?  And how do relationships, both personal and professional, shape the terms under which we operate?  These are not abstract considerations. Insofar as work defines meaning for many of us, without clarity on these topics, it is very hard to navigate life effectively.

    It is not often that an autobiography reads so compellingly, and that you want to cheer for her success, protect her from the jerks, help her to see the toxic people and their bad ways around her…in short, it is one of those few stories where she is in your living room, in your life, fully human, fully manifest, fully come to life.

    If you are interested at all in having a glimpse into the life of a high-end escort, what brought her there, what keeps her there, and what kind of lifestyle she lives, this is a great place to start.

    About the Author

    Mx Valentina is a London-based escort and professional dominatrix working at the intersection of power, intimacy, and identity. 

    Her practice is grounded in a deep understanding of human sexuality and its relationship to our bodies, and our self-perception within a social context.  Her explorations with power dynamics in particular, offer clients a safe way to let go of shame and to explore their deerp structure.

    She writes on sex work, relationships, and the dynamics of desire across her platforms, and is a co-founder of Aetas Deae, a women-centred project on Lake Como which explores philosophy, praxis, and community through lived experience.

    About the Author

    Mx Valentina is a London-based escort and professional dominatrix working at the intersection of power, intimacy, and identity. Her practice is grounded in structure, clarity, and mutual awareness, with a focus on experiences that are deliberate rather than performative.

    She writes on sex work, relationships, and the dynamics of desire across her platforms, and is the founder of Aetas Deae, a project exploring philosophy, praxis, and community through lived experience.

    You can find more of Valentina’s writing on Substack where she writes Diary of a Sex Witch

  • 104. Unsane

    104. Unsane

    Whore Feminism, Agency, and Philosophy at the Dinner Table

    The other day, over dinner with my adult children, I was confronted by my own philosophy.  A moment when philosophy becomes real life.

    As a woman I believe that one of the most empowering and empowered things is to ask people to pay for access to your body.  Whore Feminism is more than just an incidental stance.  It is a foundational philosophy.  Ontological.  It is not just the core of my being; it is who I am.  My nature, the very essence of my being.

    And when that happens, if you are to be true to yourself, then you reorganise the world around you to fit that model.  I would like to propose the three ways people navigate reality.  Sane, insane and unsane.  These are not clinical definitions, but ones which describe the nuance of the lived world.

    • Sane: a state where an individual adjusts their internal beliefs and perceptions to align with objective, external facts and evidence;
    • Insane: a state where an individual believes their internal beliefs inherently are external reality, disregarding contradictory evidence
    • Unsane: a conscious act of deliberately manipulating or shaping the external world to match personal desires and inner will, rather than conforming to it or denying its existence.  Unsane is about the exercise of agency as primordial.

    These are not terms from the world of scholarly or even pop psychology, so I can hear some of you shrieking.  The person who shared this with me also had an agenda, to which I do not ascribe, but generally agree that to be unsane is the healthiest of the three. 

    We might collectively agree that it’s good to be sane and not good to be insane, but I am not sure that a value judgement in either case is appropriate.  In a way, it feels as if being sane is more than normal, it just is.  A kind of default that comes along with circuitry and is the universe’s form of giving us all a user manual.  Insane is a flawed instruction set, someone writing precise instructions in a language they only half speak. 

    Unsane presents more moral ambiguity.  We can name a contemporary political figure whose will-to-shape exceeds his ethical circuitry.  Indeed our current world offers several examples.  Sometimes people with hard-to-stomach views end up in my arms, and yet, I find myself able to contain us both.  And a part of this has to do with what draws me to this work, and the potential for the erotic to create a sympathetic reaction in my partner.  And I mean the wiring of our belief systems.

    My intentionally naïve view is that people are fundamentally good, but sometimes they cannot see it, live it, act on it, because they cannot go back to core.  Perhaps it is scary, or self-described ugly.  My role is to walk there hand in hand and observe, feel, but not judge.  Using that which is sexual is simply a way to gain access. 

    Leaving that plum dangling…the issue with any number of toxic political leaders’ version of unsanity has nothing to do with agency but rather arrogance, narcissism, whatever it is where the “do no harm” circuity got fucked up.  But just as there are unsane examples in the deficit column, history has shown us others who have dared to imagine a better world.

    In other words, unsanity is morally neutral; it produces both reckless tyrants and architects of new social contracts.  The definition holds.

    Collectively we adore the unsane.  These are the visionaries, the ones who remake the world to an image that only they can see.  Marie Curie saw that radiation could be therapeutic and not just harmful (and remains the only person to have ever won two Nobel Prizes).  Rosalind Franklin, remember that name, whose work discovered the double-helix structure of DNA (not the men who stole her ideas and have popular credit).  They were both demonstrably unsane.

    Over dinner, one of my adult children, yes, prostitutes do have children, and yes, we also have sit-down meals together, opened an awkward, funny, instructive conversation.  To be clear, my children are adults and have been adults for the entire time they have known about what I do.

    “I booked an escort.  It was fun.”

    “What?  When?”

    “Last week.”

    “Oh my God.”

    “Who?” that’s my first question?  Because, shucks, we tend to know each other.

    “I bet I can guess,” said another one of my adult children.

    “What?”

    “How did you find her?”

    “Tryst.”

    “I’m on that platform.”

    “But not in my city.”

    “Yes, I am.  I tour in your city.  Its just a matter of time before you see my ad.”

    “Oh my,” it was their turn to express surprise.

    “Well, we always said this would happen sooner or later.”

    “Can’t you go on a different platform.  Tryst makes it so easy.”

    “Unfortunately, no, it’s one of my best sources of business.”

    I quickly pulled out my phone and checked my ad.  I have a scheduled tour to their town coming up and wanted to see if I was showing up in the results yet.  Thankfully no.  But it made me think carefully about each of the photos I have on my profile and which ones I wouldn’t want them to see or their friends to see.

    As while I can count on them not wanting to click through and see me, their friends would likely have a morbid curiosity.  It reminds of how one of my closest friends in college, a guy, used to say how fuckable my mother was.  It is remarkable that we stayed friends, but how refreshing I found his unfettered self-expression was greater than my discomfort at his occasional saying of things you just don’t say.

    My kids have known I am an escort for as long as I have been one and were adults when I became one.  We don’t keep secrets from one another.  And they have seen me coming home from appointments or going to them.  Have even travelled with me on tour when we wanted to spend time together, but there was someone “I needed to see,” whilst we were there.

    I make no secret of loving travel bookings more than any other (the Fly Me To You or Fly You To Me).  There is something powerful and ritual about travel, both for me and for the person who sees me.  Travel removes habit, and this is a powerful unlocking mechanism.  Entry into the sacred space of what I do is begun the moment you step out your door with the intention of spending time with a companion.

    It is a shame, a wasted opportunity, to not bring intention to every interaction, every conscious act of doing.  In a way that is what magic is.

    You might ask yourself what does a parent talk about when their children reveal that they like to see escorts.  Our conversation was about manners, respect, agency, consent, boundaries.  We also talked about falling in love, and how important it was to recognise that escorts are perhaps the best in the world at making you want them, but that is the art, short for artifice, and only the fool believes that it will be different.

    It is the fool, however, who changes the world.  In Tarot, it is the first card and can be the most powerful.  For good and bad.

    The lesson I wanted for my children was about being intentional with an escort, making her not just feel safe, but be safe, and going out of their way to be respectful and kind.  Whether they do it out of self-interest or do it because they discover that when you treat people with reverence and care, you learn lessons applicable to all of life.  And what we learn at our most receptive, as our heads lay on the pillow in a cloud of post-coital bliss, is what rewires us, motivates us, shapes who we are.

    This is a moral dilemma.  Not because of sex but because of power.  What I wanted is for my children to respect my sisters.  I do not doubt their own respect for me.  Here, they have a chance to prove it, when it has nothing to do with me.

    My choice to be an escort is central to my identity and to the exercise of agency.  A man’s choice to be respectful is just as strong a statement of identity.  Outside of whoring, my vanilla life is simply an acceptable version of the same, I stand with women and train men for not just a future world centred on women, but to make that world now.  Am I unsane?  You bet I am.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Mediu

  • 102. I hold this truth to be self-evident: women should run things

    102. I hold this truth to be self-evident: women should run things

    From time to time someone asks me, usually as a joke:

    “So… do you actually think women should run everything?”

    They tend to laugh while asking. The laugh is doing a lot of work.

    The assumption underneath the joke is that women in power would behave the way men in power have behaved, just with better manners or sharper heels. Same shouting, same chaos, same damage, different faces.  Same dudes, just different duds.

    That assumption says more about how power is currently experienced than about women.

    Most people associate authority with irritation, punishment, and avoidance. Power arrives late, notices little, and reacts badly. If that is your reference point, of course the idea of anyone else running things sounds dangerous.

    What people rarely admit is that they are not afraid of women being cruel. They are afraid of women being attentive.

    Patriarchal systems are impersonal. You can underperform for years without anyone clearly addressing it. You can cause harm and never face the people affected. Responsibility is spread so thin that no one ever has to take it directly.

    Female authority tends to work differently. It is closer. It notices patterns. It corrects earlier. It expects people to respond when something is pointed out. This is not comforting to everyone.  People might actually have to work…

    I work with authority professionally. People come to me because they want structure. They are often surprised by what true structure feels like.

    Men frequently expect dominance to feel adversarial. What they experience instead is relief. Fewer decisions. Clear expectations. Consequences that make sense. Someone paying attention so they do not have to manage everything themselves.

    Women notice something else. Firmness does not require harshness. Leadership does not need distance. Someone can be in charge without being bossy or cruel.

    Once people experience authority that functions, they tend to stop romanticising freedom from it.

    This is where the fantasy of women taking over becomes interesting. It is not driven by ideology. It is driven by exhaustion. People are tired of systems that create messes and then disappear. They want leadership that actually reduces friction rather than creating it.

    There is also, undeniably, something attractive about that.

    Competence is attractive. Calm authority is attractive. Someone who sees what is happening and intervenes before things fall apart is attractive. Someone who takes responsibility without apology is very attractive.

    This is not about humiliating men or reversing roles. It is about giving responsibility to the people who tend to handle it better. Less noise. Less damage. Better outcomes.

    In my world, authority is not dramatic. It does not shout. It does not threaten. It notices, decides, and follows through.

    If that idea sounds appealing rather than frightening, you are probably already aligned with it.

    And if you find yourself curious about what it might feel like to be guided by someone who notices everything and does not need to raise her voice—

    In practice, this is what my work looks like.

    I meet people who are tired of managing themselves badly. People who want fewer choices, clearer limits, and someone who will actually notice when things drift.

    I am selective. I work privately. I do not offer novelty, entertainment, or reassurance on demand. I offer structure that works.

    Some people read this and feel nothing. They move on.

    Others recognise the feeling immediately.

    If you are one of them, you already know what you are looking for.

    Booking details are available on the site. Read carefully before reaching out.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

  • 100. Pretty Boys Finish First

    100. Pretty Boys Finish First

    Men, Power, Submission, and who I will and won’t work with

    This post was inspired by a long-form essay on Substack on the meaning of the Pretty Boy and how a different kind of man was already adapting to the coming reality of a Matriarchal Era. While it covers some of the same of the ground in that post, this one serves more to help you, my dear reader, to orient yourself within my world. You can find that essay here.

    I make no secret about being a feminist.  It is the central pillar of my life, morality, and purpose.  It is also central to my practice as a dominatrix.  But I regard my feminism as a public service.

    So many men are lost.  And while I don’t feel any personal obligation to the incel, or the currents which feed them, men as a group have reached a crisis point.  I do not pity the collective “man” and call myself a misandrist.  But I do love individual men.  Respect them, honour them, work with them.  These are the ones I call the “Pretty Boys”.  They are the ones who get it, who realises the existing system and structure does not serve them either.

    It is a weak man who needs to put his fingers on the scales to feel equal.  That is what any man who supports patriarchy as a system is doing.  In that world, there is no alpha and beta, there are only weaklings, wimps, losers.

    I share this because it will help you to self-select.  Are you strong?  Is submission a path you can follow in a way that cultivates your strength, that situates you well for the life ahead.  Or is it just another form of shame?

    When people talk about the “alpha man” they are grasping for will’ o’ wisps.  False Gods.  Illusions.  Fantasies.  Attempting to wish something into existence when it is a logical fallacy is just desperate.

    The entire edifice on which male dominance is built, the patriarchy itself, is fundamentally, structurally, logically unsound.  The essence of that system is the denial of women’s choice.  But there isn’t a man out there who doesn’t know deep down that it is women who choose.

    Women can just get laid if they want to.  Men cannot.  We all know this.  The entire alpha weeze is built on a sense of false injustice that follows this simple fact.  Resentment.  Fear.  And patriarchal subjugation of the female is just one elaborate dance to shame us into levelling the playing field for you.  Of feeling sorry for men.

    The truth of these statements is borne out by male sexual violence, in particular, that it occurs most frequently with people who already know us.  Entitlement to the female body.  It is not justified, it is only frustration and fear that he will never be chosen.

    The Pretty Boy is not the opposite of the alpha.  That is the beta, another false man.  And when I say ‘false’, I mean living in a parallel reality, one which is founded on false assumptions.  

    The pretty boy is a different species altogether.  This is the man of the future.  The man of the present.  The pretty boy lives in truth.  Matriarchy as a system is the natural order.  A female centred world is the natural order.

    A pretty boy is simply a man who understands that and is able to live productively in that structure.  He is not by nature submissive for he does not need to be.  He is not a wimp, or a loser, for he is far stronger in himself than anyone who resorts to power dynamics for personal legitimacy.

    No, the pretty boy is a centred man.  One in touch with himself, with his feelings, and capable of interacting with women as equals, partners.  He is also a true man in the sense that he does not stand silent in the face of toxic behaviour.  He is grounded in himself to fear no other man.  He sees women as the beginning and ending of life, and in that recognition, finds himself in service to Her.

    You won’t be surprised that I find the concept of a male dom laughable.  I would rather say, double loser.  A man who gets off on play about power dynamics which echo the most toxic aspects of society is the true beta.  The supposed “beta”, or man who likes to play “sissy”, or gets lost in his submission, or desire for degradation, just needs some guidance to channel the energy in a more personally positive way.

    As a trans and intersex dominatrix, many people who approach me do so because they feel that something is wrong.  Something is off.   In society, in the way they navigate through it.  Part of their attraction to me is reflective of their own struggles with identity.  My power stems from having navigated it.

    I refuse shame.  I refuse to hide.  And there is nothing more addictive to someone in hiding than freedom.

    Some of my colleagues don’t like working with people who are new to kink or BDSM, and many lament their distaste for people who fetishise them.  I don’t mind as long as someone is respectful with me, as no matter what brings someone to me, a deeper need is being expressed.  In other words, you can have whatever “twisted, shameful” fantasy that wish, and I will love it in you provided your heart is in the right place.  Where is that?  That your desire to be with me is structural in orientation, that you sense the beauty in that which lies deeper.  That you want more than to just “get off”.  You want your life and your purpose to be re-oriented, to make sense, to truly fulfil you.

    And without setting out to change someone (that is for you not for me), and especially without judging you, the “work” is finding that place deep inside which drives you…and it is beautiful, always beautiful…to discover it, play with it, and watch it unfold and blossom.

    My training and practice is unique.  Drawing on power exchange, somatic therapy, energy work, and tantra with life experience at high levels of corporate success, yet driven by the insight that sexual desire, our perception of the erotic, is the language of the Divine, and the only force capable of driving true change, because my charges crave something deeper.

    In my practice, I seek women and men who wish to see their lives blossom.  And sometimes this means we have to go back to the very beginning and replay life from earliest memory and even before.  To let love in, to allow for attunementand attachment to resettle, but most of all, to help you find deep inner purpose.  I am so selective about who I see and who I will keep seeing because I go into this with you, and it takes a lot of me to be present with you during your journey.

    There may be other ways to settle into ourselves, and many may find them, or what works…but what I know is the gains and the strength that my charges experience when they approach kink and power exchange with purpose and so with a true guide.

    Please understand that if this material resonates with you, that is an excellent first step, but is no guarantee that I will work with you.  And committing to see me is not a booking per se, it is an orientation.  Though I may be a session domme, my orientation is completely lifestyle—and while I will play with you, of course, these are your rewards for making the deeper shifts in yourself that affirm your submission as structural orientation.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

    About Aetas Deae

    Aetas Deae is a female-centred philosophical and living project devoted to living female authority as a biological, social, and ethical reality. It explores matriarchal principles not as ideology, but as a natural form of governance and community. Aetas Deae provides the wider ground from which this practice emerges, connecting individual transformation to collective realignment.

  • 98. Why Pronouns Matter

    98. Why Pronouns Matter

    Language, power, and the politics of meaning

    I have been thinking about pronouns, language, and gender for most of my adult life. I studied these questions decades ago, long before they became cultural flashpoints or recurring arguments on social media. What has changed is not the substance of the debate, but its visibility — and the intensity of the resistance to it.

    That resistance is often framed as confusion. As though the problem were novelty, excess, or too much change too quickly. From where I stand, that explanation has never been convincing. The difficulty has never been understanding pronouns. It has been accepting what they reveal about power, belonging, and who gets to pass as the default.

    Language feels neutral only when it works in your favour.

    When language stops being invisible

    For many people, language has always moved quietly in the background. Words like he and she arrive without friction. They align neatly with expectation. They require no explanation, no self-consciousness, no pause.

    That ease creates the illusion that language simply reflects reality.

    But language is not a mirror. It is a system of habits. It trains us in what to notice and what to ignore, who must speak themselves into being and who is assumed without effort. When language changes, what is disturbed is not clarity, but comfort.

    The moment language asks something of you — attention, adjustment, choice — it stops feeling neutral. It starts being called political.

    Naming, defaults, and power

    Pronouns are not just grammatical conveniences. They locate people socially. They tell us who belongs without explanation and who must clarify themselves to be intelligible at all.

    Every society has defaults. Those defaults are rarely named. Everyone else is.

    This is why certain terms provoke outsized reactions. Naming the default feels intrusive to those who have never had to name themselves. What is experienced as imposition is often simply symmetry.

    Resistance here is not primarily about words. It is about the loss of invisibility.

    What resistance is really protecting

    When people say “it’s just language,” what they usually mean is that language has never been a site of struggle for them. It has never placed them at risk of being misrecognised. It has never had material consequences for their safety, dignity, or legitimacy.

    For those whose identities have always been linguistically secure, change can feel like loss. For those whose identities have always been contested, it feels like oxygen.

    This asymmetry is the heart of the conflict. Not confusion. Not excess. Not fragility.

    Why this matters beyond manners

    Pronouns are often dismissed as a matter of politeness. That framing dramatically understates what is at stake.

    Language shapes institutions. It informs medical systems, legal recognition, education, employment, and access to care. Being misnamed is not a symbolic inconvenience; it is a structural problem. It determines who is legible and who is treated as an exception, an edge case, or a threat.

    You do not need to understand someone’s internal experience to recognise that they are the authority on it. Respecting pronouns is not an act of ideological alignment. It is an acknowledgment of reality.

    A note on authority

    I write about this not as a recent participant in the debate, but as someone who has lived inside it for decades. I was trained to study how meaning is produced and enforced.

    I work as a dominatrix. In that role, language is not metaphorical. Words establish consent, negotiate power, and produce real consequences in real bodies. Precision matters because misnaming is not an abstract mistake — it is a breach of trust.

    Across all of this, the lesson has been consistent: language is never neutral. It either expands the world or constricts it.

    An invitation, not a demand

    You do not have to master every term or anticipate every change. No one does. What matters is the direction of your attention.

    If language has always felt easy, that ease is worth examining — not defensively, but honestly. It may tell you something about where you have been standing.

    Pronouns matter not because they are fashionable or virtuous, but because they remind us that language is alive, and that the world it creates can be widened.

    All that is required is the willingness to let it.

    — Mx Valentina


    I work privately with individuals who are drawn to power exchange that is intelligent, intentional, and grounded in language. If you are curious about working with me, details are available here.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

  • 97. Blue balls: fact or fiction?

    97. Blue balls: fact or fiction?

    A Dominant’s perspective on male entitlement, chastity, and the exquisite discipline of not coming

    Let me say this once, clearly and with no hesitation: “blue balls” is not a medical emergency. It’s a myth. A piece of well-spun folklore designed to manipulate women into believing that male discomfort equals moral obligation.

    Ladies, don’t fall for it. And gentlemen? The very idea that a woman should be guilted into giving you an orgasm because you’re uncomfortable? How quaint. How utterly… patriarchal.

    Now, be a good boy and keep reading.


    The Cult of the Male Climax

    Our culture has been marinating in the idea that male release is not just natural—it’s necessary. This is reinforced in everything from sitcoms to sex manuals to self-help books dressed up as scripture. Even that ever-smiling tome The Five Love Languages insists that men need sex as a form of connection and relief, while women supposedly crave only emotional intimacy.

    As if orgasms have genders.
    As if male arousal somehow confers the right to expect satisfaction.

    Let me offer a different proposition: you don’t need release.
    You need discipline.

    In my practice as a tantric dominatrix, eschewing climax is not a trick or a tease but the essence of the work: tantra teaches that to edge is to cultivate power, presence, and coherence, while release dissipates it—so what men call “blue balls” is in fact a training ground for growth, tragically reframed by patriarchal conditioning as women’s moral obligation to spill male seed, despite all evidence that men are weakened by relentless self-indulgence.


    Orgasm Denial as Devotion

    I’ve played with more than one partner who claimed they had to come.
    “It hurts,” they say. “It’s distracting.”

    How tragic.

    My solution? Take away the choice entirely.

    Enter chastity.

    Not because it’s kinky (though it most certainly is), but because it’s correct. It restores order. It de-centers the penis. It quiets the demand. And in that silence, something remarkable happens—submission blooms.

    The first time I placed a sub in chastity, I didn’t even need a cage. Just a bit of pink ribbon. He squirmed. He gasped.

    “This is mine now,” I said, tying him up with as much ceremony as I’d tie a gift, pretty bow and all. “You may put your clothes back on. But the ribbon stays.”

    He wore it under his trousers all evening. Smiling. Tamed. Owned.

    And let’s be honest, isn’t that what he was begging for?


    Release Is Overrated

    I’ve never understood the fuss about orgasms. The big crescendo. The desperate panting toward climax. It’s all a bit… overacted. Most men look vaguely ridiculous when they come, and afterward, they tend to fall asleep, roll over, or otherwise exit the scene—physically or emotionally.

    How boring.

    Arousal, on the other hand, is enduring. It simmers. It stretches time. It makes you useful.

    An aroused sub is attentive, obedient, soft-eyed. I keep them just at the edge—ripe with longing and full of devotion.

    Release? That’s for aftercare. Maybe. If I’m feeling generous. Not.


    If It Hurts, It’s Working

    Let’s return to the fiction of “blue balls.” If you’re feeling discomfort, good. That’s the body remembering it doesn’t belong to you anymore. It’s mine. And pain? That’s just unprocessed pleasure.

    If I want you to come, I’ll say so.
    Until then, you may thank me for the ache.

    I once had a sub who brought up chastity cages as a curiosity. “They feel weird,” he said. “Uncomfortable.”

    I nodded. “That’s the point.”

    If it were comfortable, it wouldn’t be training—it would be décor. But a properly fitted device is only a tool. The real key is in the mind.

    True chastity isn’t about metal. It’s about surrender.


    The Paradox of the Erotic Mind

    Now, some of you might be wondering: what about fantasies? The ones where you’re milked by a coven of powerful women, reduced to a trembling creature, leashed and used?

    Yes, I know them. I’ve engineered them. And I’ve used them to bring my submissives into the sweetest states of devotion—right before I whisper, “No, not tonight. You’re not ready.”

    Arousal stays.
    Fantasy deepens.
    Control remains mine.


    The Final Word on Balls (Blue or Otherwise)

    Here’s the truth, my dear submissives: when I own your pleasure, I also own your frustration. And you’re better for it. More focused. More attuned. More… malleable.

    So next time you feel the ache, smile. That sensation you’re interpreting as need? That’s actually a gift. A gift from the one who holds your key, your collar, your leash, and your release.

    And if you’re really lucky?

    She might never use it.


    A Woman-Centred World

    We are watching the exhaustion of a civilisation built on male indulgence—on the idea that every urge must be gratified, every tension discharged, every appetite indulged. The evidence is all around us: men overstimulated, under-disciplined, morally and spiritually flabby.

    A woman-centred world does not cater to this weakness. It refines it.

    If you are a man who knows, somewhere beneath the noise, that relentless self-indulgence has not made you noble or strong—understand this: we are building the matriarchy now. We are modelling the Female-Led Way in real time.

    The smart boys will recognise it.
    The good boys will submit to it.
    The obedient boys will thrive within it.

    You are invited to meet your better self at Aetas Deae.

    Surrender is not your loss.
    It is your education.

    And if you think you are ready, you may enquire about seeing me.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

  • 96. Why Sissies Make the Best CEOs

    96. Why Sissies Make the Best CEOs

    Or: What Forbes Accidentally Got Right About Power, Gender, and Who Should Be in Charge

    I’m careful with the word sissy. In much of the kink scene it’s a loaded term, and not always in ways that serve women. Too often, it trades on the idea that femininity is humiliating when applied to men, that submission is a form of failure, and that women exist as props in a male shame-loop rather than as sovereign subjects. That version of the fantasy does nothing to dismantle patriarchy; it simply dresses it up in stockings. That is not my work.

    When I use the word sissy here, I use it deliberately, provocatively, and with clear intent: not to eroticise the degradation of women, but to expose how brittle conventional masculinity really is. What interests me is not men becoming “less,” but men becoming precise—men who can kneel by choice, yield without disappearing, and orient themselves cleanly to female authority without parody or resentment. In that sense, sissy becomes a challenge rather than a caricature: a refusal of noisy dominance, a rejection of entitlement, and an invitation into a form of power that does not need to posture. Framed this way, the word stops being regressive and becomes diagnostic. It tells me who is ready to grow, and who is still playing dress-up with patriarchy.

    Let me start with something deliciously ironic.

    Forbes.  Yes, that Forbes.  “The Capitalist Tool.”  The glossy mouthpiece of capitalism, power lunches, and corner offices.

    A few years ago, they ran an article with the headline:

    “Androgyny: An Emerging Trend in Leadership.”

    I nearly choked on my coffee.  Because if you’ve spent any time in my world, you already know this:
    the people who make the best leaders are not the loudest, the hardest, or the most aggressively “alpha.”  They’re the ones with range.  They’re the ones who can listen and decide.  Yield and command.  Hold authority without puffing their chest or swinging it around like a blunt instrument.  In other words: the very people society loves to mock as sissies.

    Power Isn’t What You Think It Is

    For decades, leadership has been sold as a performance.  Sharp suits. Hard edges. Certainty at all costs.

    That worked—briefly—in a slower, simpler world.  Not anymore.

    Today’s leaders are navigating fragile egos, global reach, complex teams, reputational landmines, and constant change. Charging ahead without reading the room isn’t strength—it’s incompetence.

    The people who succeed are the ones who can:

    • notice when the energy shifts
    • feel resistance before it becomes revolt
    • pause without freezing
    • act without posturing

    That’s not softness.  That’s skill.  And yes, those skills are exactly what many men are trained not to develop.

    Why the “Sissy” Has an Advantage

    The so-called sissy has already done the work most executives avoid: work that many women will recognise instantly from their own lives. They’ve learned to sit with discomfort. They’ve had their identity questioned. They’ve been forced to read people carefully, because getting it wrong has consequences.

    They know how to surrender without disappearing. They know how to follow without losing themselves. They know that control is far more effective when it’s chosen.

    That’s not weakness. That’s leadership training.

    Women Didn’t Get Better at Leadership—They Were Trained Into It

    Women didn’t suddenly “get good” at leadership.  They were pushed into it sideways.

    • Holding authority while being liked.
    • Speaking firmly without being called cold.
    • Managing emotion, their own and everyone else’s, without losing momentum.

    That constant balancing act?  It builds extraordinary capacity.

    Which is why organisations with women in charge keep outperforming the rest—financially, creatively, and operationally.  Not because women are saints.  But because they’ve been practising under pressure their entire lives.

    What This Has to Do With Me

    Late in my career, I stopped pretending power was something abstract.  I became a dominatrix.

    Not because I abandoned leadership—but because I refined it.  In my work now, power is named.  Boundaries are explicit.  Consent is clear.  Responsibility is non-negotiable.

    People don’t come to me to be humiliated.  They come to learn how to use power cleanly.

    They kneel not because they are weak—but because they are precise enough to choose it.  And once you’ve learned how to yield on purpose, authority becomes effortless.

    The Truth, Stated Plainly

    The future does not belong to the loudest or most dominant man in the room.  It belongs to the one who can feel what’s happening without flinching.

    It belongs to the leader who doesn’t panic when certainty evaporates.  To the one who can command and receive.  To the one who knows when to push—and when to wait.

    If that makes you uncomfortable, good.  If it excites you, even better.  And if you’re curious what it feels like to experience power that doesn’t need to shout, you already know where to find me…

    Apply to serve.

    If you find yourself drawn to women who lead — not performatively, but structurally — you may recognise this orientation beyond the personal. My work sits within a broader philosophical and social framework known as Aetas Deae. It is a space for those interested in female-led relationships, female authority, and forms of community that centre women without apology. If you are a man who understands the value of orienting to that power, or a woman — on either side of the slash — who wishes to explore community with other women who lead, you are welcome to begin there: aetasdeae.org.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

  • 83. Time Is the Real Luxury: On Manners, Money and Mutual Respect

    83. Time Is the Real Luxury: On Manners, Money and Mutual Respect

    A dominatrix on why respect—not haggling—is the real aphrodisiac.

    As I write this note I am sitting in the First Class lounge of could-be-any airport. There is a man at my table with his wife, and he has his feet on the table. Not okay. He knows it too, because every time I return after getting a drink or snack, he takes his feet away. So why do it?

    Finally, the one time he didn’t, I asked him: Is this what you do at home, put your feet on the furniture?” He took them down fast and apologised. It was too sotto voce for my liking. “Did you say something?” I pressed. He repeated his apology, louder this time.  His wife looked on in pain.  When he got up, she allowed herself to smile.

    As I sidled up to the bar, which was a crush of people pouring themselves drinks and a few barstools on the other side.  It was obviously self-service.  A man said to a woman on the other side, “I’ll take red wine.”  I looked at both of them.  She was obviously a passenger, and was far better dressed than him.  They were obviously not together.  Did he mistake her for someone who worked there?  Such people were visibly around and in uniform.  She poured a glass of sparkling white.  “I said red,” he said.  She blinked at him and walked away with her glass in hand.  He stood there and blinked, and waited.  For what?  To ask someone else rather than pour it himself?  Was he genuinely confused.  Another passenger leaned to him and said, “its self-service.”  He didn’t react, but just continued to stare.

    Public manners are private character. What you do in small, visible ways tells me who you will be when no one is watching. In kink, this truth is built into protocol. High-protocol femme-domme events exist so men can practice awareness and respect

    Sometimes it’s shambolic, but at least it’s an attempt.  What I see is men struggling with even the most basic things, like how to set and clear a table; how to introduce themselves; how to be polite in conversation.  How is it possible that our standards have become so low?

    Societies create niceties to reassure ourselves of smooth interaction.  Inobservance of these niceties can then be put down to ignorance or contempt.  In a toxic twist, where you are in the social hierarchy is not just observed but also policed.  The irony is that it is the middle class who create, defend, and uphold these traditions.  Ahh, the curse of the middle child, our social buffer in all units big and small.  

    Is the massive breakdown in observance of social niceties in Western culture a function of income inequality?

    The most toxic manifestation of this lack of social grace is the one where an individual either determines that the rules don’t apply to them, or that it doesn’t occur to them that they might exist.  In a word, entitlement.  

    One of the negatives of being a sex worker is dealing with entitlement. It isn’t attractive under any circumstances. When it comes to someone’s time, bodily autonomy, or emotional labour, entitlement is just about the ugliest trait there is. If you show it, you will never see me.  Indeed, why do I insist on a video call before we ever meet for the first time?  This is what I am looking for: I am screening for entitlement.  Entitled people are asses.  I will not see asses for money.

    Let me give you an example. A man books me for an evening out. We are to go to a nice restaurant, and then back to his hotel room for a little je ne sais quoi. You get the picture. But already at the booking stage, he suggests he shouldn’t have to pay for the dining time: “After all, you have to eat anyway… and it’s Michelin-starred.”

    Please don’t misunderstand me. I would rather eat a can of sardines and toast alone than with nearly every client.  Is that harsh?  Don’t you want me to be truthful?  I want you to work to impress me.  I want you to show me beyond paying for my time, that you are bringing your very best self to any interaction with me.

    I am a dominatrix, and what I expect of you is self-awareness, of your edges, your limitations.  I don’t wish to break you down, but to work with you to find your potential as a human.  If your attitude is off at the outset, we will never gel.

    I value my free time more than anything. Time with a client is automatically work. Period. Who doesn’t prefer leisure to work? And if you don’t, we are not suited to each other. You will bore me.

    But more importantly:

    1. You’re telling me you’re so wonderful that being with you isn’t work. Let me be the judge of that. But given you’re booking me, you already know my answer.
    2. You’re telling me my free time is not important to you. Yet free time is precisely why I chose this work. It is how I flourish and thrive.
    3. You’re saying sex is the only point of our booking. But connection is what I offer. Without it, you wouldn’t have contacted me in the first place.

    It also tells me very plainly that you do not believe that Sex Work is work.  But if you stop and think for just one second, what you really want from me, really, really, is that magic which can only come in a woman’s arms.  Forgiveness.  Mercy.  Indulgence.  You want me to smile upon you.  To bare your ugliness, your shame, and for me to do what only a woman can do.  Kiss it and make it go away.

    That energy will never blossom between us if all you want is a quickie in the broom closet.

    So don’t start a future date by haggling over whether my price for social time should be different. My price is my price. I set my rate to match my appetite for what we will do together. That includes social time.

    Because time is the real luxury—and manners are the only currency that makes it worthwhile.

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.

  • 19. Non-Accidental Feminism: the Making of a Dominatrix

    19. Non-Accidental Feminism: the Making of a Dominatrix

    From witch lineage to sex work, from patriarchy to sovereignty — why my womanhood and my work are bound in the fight for freedom.

    This is a very personal post. It is a topic which matters to me greatly. There is an agenda here. I ask my subs to read my site before contacting me. It’s a form of screening. You want to know if we are mentally, energetically compatible as much as I do. It can’t all be whips and dildoes can it?

    Learning the Discipline of Service

    I was at an event not too long ago and there was a man who was tending to my feet, a self-confessed lifelong foot worshiper. He gave me the worst foot worship session I think I have ever encountered. And I was thinking, my gosh, you call yourself a foot fetishist? Have some pride. Learn some skills.

    Some of you know that philosophically I do not believe in doing to others things which I have not also experienced.  I will not wield a tool until I have felt it myself.  Case in point: I was often asked to use a bullwhip on subs, but I did not until I had been whipped myself often enough to see how to use one, until I had felt it myself.

    The same applies to all aspects of submission.  I am far more equipped as a domme thanks to the many incredible women with whom I have explored submission with.

    When I think about a session I had with a domme several years ago, she had me kneel in front of her and tend to her feet. She said, “if you are going to be a sub, then this is a skill you should develop. It will always come in handy.” What did I do? I introduced myself to a reflexologist and had her teach me how to “take care of” a woman’s feet over lessons and sessions which lasted for 6 months.

    I make this point to say, “be intentional”.  How can a man be so lazy, one who calls himself a foot lover, foot fetishist, and is a self-described sub, when he clearly has never paid even the slightest attention to what he is doing.

    If that is the kind of sub you are, stay away.  But if you are committed, and prepared to truly lean in, then read on.

    Entitlement, Submissives, and Feminist Anger

    While I was having my awful foot massage, a domme friend of mine was being lectured by a sub about female entitlement. They had such a heated discussion about feminist topics that both of them came to me afterwards. She was livid. “I can’t believe this guy calls himself a. sub with those entitled ideas of his. So offensive.”

    “I think I upset your friend there a bit,” he said a bit later when she was elsewhere. He gave me his version of events, and then added something along the lines of “she really shouldn’t take this stuff so seriously.”

    You needn’t guess whose side I was on.

    Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Women’s Labour

    Not very far into a book I am reading, Caliban and the Witch, by Silvia Federici, the author wrote something which encapsulated a number of threads which have been coming together in my life.

    Capitalism came to symbolise an assault on women’s reproductive rights…the ultimate mother lode of free labour.

    Silvia Federici

    The actual passage isn’t important, as the theme threads its way through the entire book. She is an economist and social theorist, and the book is about women’s evolving place in society. The book was written two decades ago, but with the US political landscape as it is, the assault on women is very much of the moment, and in the way she describes.

    Her thesis is that Capitalism, as a system, requires labour exploitation. She begins with the shift from Feudal society to Capitalism, which was essentially marked by a shift towards money as the primary medium of exchange. Far from bringing freedom for those with less, this change allowed for greater exploitation, the extraction of rents, and the disconnection of the labourer from the fruits of their labour, literally, and the land on which they produced it.

    This shift hit women especially hard, and Capitalism came to symbolise an assault on women’s reproductive rights…the ultimate mother lode of free labour. Puns intended.

    Monogamy as a Patriarchal Social Unit

    Another thread that I had been thinking about was that the patriarchal social unit is a monogamous marriage. Meaning that marriage is a system designed to enshrine male privilege. The narrative of “to protect and to look after” is actually about men and giving them a role, one which they might not otherwise have.

    This line, coupled with the false narrative that men have a biological need to spread the seed, whereas women have a need to find someone who will care for their child, ensure its best chance of survival. Insofar as both exist within a capitalist-patriarchal system, there is a grain of. truth to this. But it is a perverse form of Stockholm Syndrome, finding love for your jailer.

    The Absurdity of Biological Narratives

    In The Selfish Gene, a seminal book on DNA by the Harvard geneticist Richard Dawkins, he takes aim at the central theory that men should spread their seed for good biological outcomes, but not in the way one might think. He argues that DNA is the most successful virus in the history of life. In us, in humans, it has found the ideal host. We have achieved “separation” from the food chain, upending the “survival” part of genetic evolution.

    The idea that a man spreading his seed has anything to do with better biological outcomes is narcissistic and absurd.

    What matters in what he says is that the individual is lost, totally meaningless. The idea that a man spreading his seed has anything to do with better biological outcomes is narcissistic and absurd.

    The corollary of this is that marriage, monogamy, have nothing to do with better biological outcomes. They exist to enshrine a system of male dominance over female labour, and their reproductive rights more specifically.

    Community, Caregiving, and Gene Pools

    Many societies throughout the animal kingdom demonstrate this. Indeed, monogamy and pairing are the exception, not the rule. Several primate and rodent studies have shown that communal living produces better genetic outcomes: survival of offspring, and preservation of a family group of DNA. In other words, it isn’t that little Johnny survives to go on to reproduce, it is that all his cousins do too…as many as possible. It is a simple step from there to the conclusion that living in community produces a more stable and more successful gene pool.

    Think about it. There are grandmothers, sisters, aunts, but also brothers, uncles, grandfathers, who can play roles in communal caregiving. What happens under these circumstances? A woman’s life is not utterly overtaken by the demands of her child. The burden of child-rearing is spread.

    We do know that female labour force participation goes hand in hand with economic development. This has been a stated goal of many of the world’s development organisations as they work to help poor countries out of poverty. The perverse irony of this, however, is that World Bank and IMF development policy does the opposite, and breaks up communal structures, tribes, and imposes the dominant Capitalist system, Patriarchy.

    Patriarchy’s Last Gasp

    A look at the rhetoric in the US political sphere shows the truth of this. The stale, male, and pale white man is having his last entitled gasp at subjugating women. It is ugly. Time will tell how successful he is. And there are many women who have been seduced into the cause—and you know, the propaganda is powerful.

    That the fight is exhausting is intolerable, but ever so necessary. As the diminutive US State of New Hampshire has as its slogan, “Live Free or Die,” so too am I committed to the fight. Indeed, owning female sovereignty is the core of my essence as a woman, is my purpose in life, is my reason for being. When I surrendered the keys to the patriarchy and placed my body in the hands of a gifted surgeon, I showed the depth of my commitment.

    If you wish to be my client, you will not just fetishise me, you will share the meaning of this journey, respect it, honour it, and join us in the fight.

    The Witch as Healer and Threat

    It matters to me on many levels. For those of you who know me, you know I am a witch. The word conjures images of women in black, with pointy hats, riding on broomsticks, typically with pocked faces. The modern aesthetic of the witch seems to drift towards goth or the clothes of my current profession, the dominatrix.

    But what was meant by ‘witch’? Who were they? What did they do? The truth of it is that ‘witches’ were typically healers, midwives. They were pillars of their community. Did you know that after the Caesarean cut was invented in the 13th century, that it was only women who performed this delicate surgical intervention during childbirth? Women were also the keepers of the herbarium, the garden of healing plants that many families had in feudal societies and before, acting as healers and as the repository of pharmacological knowledge.

    Heresies, Genocides, and My Ancestry

    It is interesting that the first “heresies” were not so much about religious doctrine, indeed the very first genocide was Christian on Christian, when the Pope and the King of France conspired to wipe out the Albigensians. Their crime was a belief that the church had become corrupt, and that no priest was necessary to channel God…that each of us could have a personal relationship with God. They allowed women to officiate ceremonies and rebelled against the tithe and other forms of feudal taxation and appropriation.

    They were slaughtered by the hundreds of thousands, their lands taken, their protectors excommunicated, their domains lost. My family was on the losing side. It is through the escape of one to which I owe my existence. The survival of a name.

    Have you read The Crucible, by American playright and once husband of Marilyn Monroe, Arthur Miller? It is the story of Rebecca Nourse’s trial. She was the last woman to be executed for witchcraft in colonial America. She was my 12th great grandmother.

    Her story is very much of this post. She represented, however, as a midwife, healer, and pillar of her community, a threat to the male-centred, puritanical social structure forming in the colonies. A society was forming, moving from one of a survival, shared property, communal support and living based society and economy, to one centred on property rights, chastity, marriage, and “Christian values.”

    A relatively recent book, A Salem Witch by Daniel Gagnon, has capitalised on a modern lust for retellings of historic tales. I picked up the book on a recent trip to Salem and a visit to the witchcraft museum. I didn’t like the book. It is well-researched, but it interprets fact through the socio-patriarchal lens we live in. The thesis and focus of the book is on Rebecca’s innocence. It argues that she was not a ‘witch’. I resent that profoundly, as it whitewashes who she was, what she did. It erases that she was a woman, serving women, that she was a guardian of women’s reproductive power.

    Witches, Capitalism, and Women as Casualties

    Silvia Federicci’s book, Caliban and the Witch, makes the point that the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of women as witches in the Middle Ages was a direct consequence of the rise of Capitalism, a system which enshrines slave labour. Housework, child-rearing…these are women’s tasks. In virtually every shift from tribal society, from community, even those taking place in the modern era (Africa, Asia, and Latin America all offer current examples), we see women as the front line casualty of the shift.

    Capitalism and patriarchy and religion are partners in crime.

    The Taliban is an extreme and current example of social control exerted over women’s rights in the name of God. But the developed world is not immune, as the overturning of Roe v. Wade has shown. Capitalism and patriarchy and religion are partners in crime.

    The Dominatrix as Warrior

    The dominatrix is the warrior who rails against patriarchy.

    It may not seem obvious, but the dominatrix is the warrior who rails against this. It is the dominatrix, and the Sex Worker, who stand as the front line against this hegemonic narrative. Is it any wonder that the aesthetic fits? And ask yourself this. How many male clients really just want a kink dispenser who makes them feel all right about this system of exploitation? Is it not the sexualisation of male guilt?

    Are they not just paying us to pretend? Does playing submissive for a little while, and paying for it, not give them license to feel relieved at the profound social injustice which continues to define society?

    Becoming Woman, Becoming Feminist

    Was I a feminist when I was a boy? Can a man be a feminist? That question is beyond the scope of this post. Was I even a boy at all is also beyond the scope of this post. So too is a discussion about whether trans women are women, or whether Sex Workers can be feminists. All the answers to these questions lie in the patriarchal man lust to divide and conquer. I will just say this. Becoming a woman, physically, was as much about the philosophical underpinnings of this post.

    I grew up with a burning desire to fight for women.

    I grew up with a burning desire to fight for women. I cannot separate being a trans woman from this hunger to fight this issue. My legitimacy as a fighter on this topic was one of the reasons that I had to have a sex change. I made a choice to dedicate my life to women. I didn’t fetishize women, dominant women, and never had a sexual thrill from cross-dressing, or from being a sissy. No.

    This for me was about my spiritual and moral essence. Learning as I did late in life of my genetic connection to a lineage of witches on both sides of my family served to explain. We do carry ancestral trauma genes do have memory. My purpose on this planet is to carry this message.

    The Inevitability of Becoming Dominatrix

    It is and has been inevitable that I became woman, that I became a dominatrix, that I became a Sex Worker. And it is very important that a client understands that.

    I love to play. I love the erotic, love desire. But my clients are expected to expect more of themselves. I am looking for recruits. Foot soldiers, captains of industry, those who will spread the gospel of truth, who will be a part of a new world order, a new belief system, a new spiritual practice.

    Sex Witchery as Transformation

    You do not lay rotten fruit at the foot of a Goddess.

    I choose to be a Sex Witch because I know that through your sexual hunger, you can be transformed.

    My time is expensive because my clients need to value it, and to value themselves. Because changing the world is no task for wimps, sissies or losers. You do not lay rotten fruit at the foot of a Goddess. You become great, you change, you grow, you learn.

    Do you live your life in line with your beliefs? I do. If you are my sub, that is what we will do together, help you become your full potential in line with your values, your desires, your beliefs, and getting there, the journey will get you off in little ways, every day, but on life, in a major way.

    These truths shape not only my politics but also my joy, as you’ll see in my Behind the Scenes Dominatrix Diary

    An Invitation

    If you are here, something in you has already responded.

    This is not casual booking, and it is not for everyone. I work with people who are curious, intelligent, and willing to take responsibility for what they want.

    Those who wish to work with me do not request. They present themselves.

    Begin here.

    About Me

    Mx Valentina is a feminist dominatrix, a trans and intersex woman, whose practice centres on ethical power exchange and the conditions under which lives reorganise themselves around purpose rather than shame. Her work is selective and relational, grounded in the belief that submission is not a role to be played but an orientation that must already be present. She works only with those who understand that access is conditional and authority is not negotiated.  You can find my scholarly feminist writing on Substack and lighter pieces on Medium.